Yes the additional features FCPX has gained and the general improvements certainly make it usable for some work.
And we're seeing a trickle of training needs for FCPX but all so far are for non broadcast clients.
So far we've seen no mention or impact of FCPX on any of our broadcast or corporate client work. But the day will come of course.
We're fortunate enough to have FCPX around and be across it so we can handle those requests when they start but so far not a sniff.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Roger <rogershuff@...> wrote:
>
> I think FCPX is spreading out beyond the ski-hat wearers, cool or not.
>
> On 9 Apr 2013, at 05:21, avidzombie wrote:
>
> > Please let us not even think of comparing middle-of-the-road basic set of wheels Camry with unmatched editing application which is Media Composer. Try Lamborghini than, if you want to stay with cars.
> >
> > There is no FCP anymore. Not in the picture for serious editors. It's left reserved for the cool ski-hat-wearing crowd that doesn't know drop-frame from non drop-frame.
> >
> > And think about this:
> > if MC 6.5 was 2.5K
> > and MC 7 is 0.7K
> > then
> > either MC 6.x was grossly over-priced
> > or MC 7 is grossly under-priced.
> >
> > BTW there once was MC 7 that started at 50K, but let's not talk about my age. :)
> >
> >
>
> With best wishes,
> Roger Shufflebottom
> +44 7973 543 660
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (17) |
No comments:
Post a Comment