Most of us on this list would agree that having the highest possible resolution at acquisition gives us greater flexibility and quality in the post process to create our work. My original point was not that we should turn our noses up at 4k. It was to point out that within finite budgets we have to make hard decisions. If I am shooting a factual documentary and have the option of capturing one interview with an expensive camera or three with a less expensive camera, I would choose the latter, as doing the former would not be a fair treatment of the subject matter. Fortunately we have a new breed of affordable high quality cameras that can mostly provide the best of both worlds.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Mark Spano <cutandcover@...> wrote:
>
> Andi's got it. I want more resolution, period. Not for the sake of it
> looking more 'real', but for the sake of quality. To preserve the potential
> for the experience. This is something that people who turn their noses up
> at high-fidelity-philes don't get. Higher resolution allows for the finer
> resolving of detail. Even if that detail is grain, noise, motion blur,
> reverb trails, perspective and spatial cues, etc. - I want to see and hear
> that. Right now there are a small number of theaters in NYC that have
> installed 4K projectors. I've definitely noticed the difference. Some
> theaters have beefed up their audio reproduction systems with higher
> headroom amplifiers. An amp can resolve fine details easier when it doesn't
> have to work as hard.
>
> Yes, there's definitely something to be said about it being the performance
> that matters, not how it was captured. That a crappy dictaphone recording
> of a great performance is still awesome. I agree, but how amazing would it
> be to have had a master tape recorder capturing that? How much better is it
> to watch Friends and Seinfeld in HD, remastered from the 35mm? My opinion:
> SO much.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Andi Meek <kwikpasta@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > Just because the camera is capturing something with perfect clarity,
> > doesn't mean what it is capturing needs to be perfect realism. I'd rather
> > see a great story captured beautifully than a great story told by a phone
> > camera. To me, a beautifully shot scene is still an important part of the
> > film-going experience. I don't want it to look like I could have shot it.
> >
> > Andi
> >
> > To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
> > From: ph@...
> > Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:20:37 +0000
> > Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Who needs 4K?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Time to revisit that great interview of Jean Renoir by Jacques
> > Rivette (who wasn't the director we know then) where he talks exactly about
> > that :
> >
> >
> > http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3zrc8_propos-de-jean-renoir_creation#.UTm1I6VZq7w
> >
> >
> >
> > "In the history of all arts, the arrival of perfect realism coincided with
> > perfect decadence."
> >
> > "Technical perfection can only create boredom, because it only reproduces
> > nature".
> >
> >
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Mark Spano <cutandcover@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I would notice. I'd say 'wow for such a great story like this you'd think
> >
> > > they could've shot better than VHS'. We see it every time, the iPhone
> >
> > > quality or whatever low fidelity sources. It matters. I don't mind if
> > it's
> >
> > > the only way it could've been recorded, like those GoPros on the helmets
> > of
> >
> > > wakeboarders or whatever. But no one is going to sit and watch a feature
> >
> > > length 'film' shot on phones. (yet)…
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
> > http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (14) |
No comments:
Post a Comment