Go 2.35. That is the European standard. For more pain inducing information on the subject:
"Rec. 709 is written as if it specifies the capture and transfer characteristics of HDTV encoding - that is, as if it were scene-referred. However, in practice it is output (display) referred with the convention of a 2.4-power function display [2.35 power function in EBU recommendations]. (Rec. 709 and sRGB share the same primary chromaticities and white point chromaticity; however, sRGB is explicitly output (display) referred with an average gamma of 2.2.)"
From: <<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rec._709>>
And if you want yet more pain, you can always go to Charles Poynton:
<<http://www.poynton.com/PDFs/GammaFAQ.pdf>>
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Fabrice Altman" <fabricealtman@...> wrote:
>
> > The new standard is 2.4.
>
> Ha! Standard ? ;)
>
> So, because 2.4 is not in the prefs, would you crush a bit less (2.35) or a bit more (2.45) (assuming the monitor is calibrated) ?
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@> wrote:
> >
> > The new standard is 2.4.
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Fabrice Altman" <fabricealtman@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > we use a JVC DT-V24G1E to monitor our edits.
> > > It's got a gamma setting options of 2.2, 2.35, 2.45 or 2.6.
> > >
> > > It's at 2.2 by default but I'm tempted to put it at 2.35 or 2.45.
> > > No calibration science involved, just a hunch when I see regular
> > > TVs around...
> > >
> > > Would that sort of make sense?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > F.
> > >
> >
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (9) |
No comments:
Post a Comment