There is a 120 if you're working in 25fps.
DNxHD 115 / 120 / 145 are the same compression at different frame rates.
DNxHD 175 / 185 / 220 are the same as well (24/25/29.97)
DNxHD 36 is called 36 in both 24 and 25, even though at 25 it is actually 40.
Sent from my iPad
On 20 jan. 2013, at 18:59, Michael Brockington brocking@sfu.ca> wrote:
> I have the feeling Bouke meant DNx220, since there isn't actually a
> DNx120, but maybe he will chime in to clarify!
>
> Cheers,
> --Michael
>
>
> On 13-01-20 2:09 AM, bartekz wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Y'all,
>>
>> DNx 120 it is plus some decent drive space, Clipwrap and...
>>
>> Rip-a-dee-doo-dah!
>>
>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com ,
>> Robert Ferguson wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you Bouke!
>>>
>>> I'm always trying to teach assistants the difference between
>> resolution and compression. Avid certainly doesn't help.
>>>
>>> I feel better now.
>>>
>>> Robert Ferguson
>>>
>>> On Jan 19, 2013, at 5:27 PM, bouke wrote:
>>>
>>>> First a bit of a rant, can we ALL (that means Avid) stop mixing
>> Compression
>>>> with Resolution?
>>>> (not typical for this thread, but had to vent something)
>>>>
>>>> for you, DNxHD 36 is full res at HIGH compression. It sucks for
>> delivery, no
>>>> matter the downconvert.
>>>> It will introduce a lot of compression artefacts.
>>>> Now, since you're from the PAL side of the world, you could
>> downconvert and
>>>> work in DV.
>>>> That will even be smaller, and way better quality, and will make a
>> fine
>>>> DVcam master
>>>> BUT, internet delivery is nowadays HD. 720x576 (and deinterlaced)
>> will NOT
>>>> be top quality for the net.
>>>> Even YouTube is doing 1080 nowadays.
>>>>
>>>> so, listen to everyone here, buy some drivespace, transcode to
>> DNxHD 120 and
>>>> work with that.
>>>> Any half decent transcoder you have laying around will do the
>> transfer.
>>>> Let your machine rip 24/7 and be done with it.
>>>>
>>>> ht
>>>>
>>>> Bouke
>>>>
>>>> VideoToolShed
>>>> van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
>>>> 6512 AS NIJMEGEN
>>>> The Netherlands
>>>> +31 24 3553311
>>>> www.videotoolshed.com
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "bartekz" zbimages@...>
>>>> To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com >
>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 7:01 PM
>>>> Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: AVCHD workflow for final SD DVCAM master
>>>>
>>>> all I have is my trusty Macbook Pro 4.1,OS 10.6.8, 2.5GHz, Intel 2
>> core, 4
>>>> GB RAM. From what I know 6.5 won't run on that. I can deal with
>> that, it's
>>>> the codec question that puzzles me. Is DNx 36 ok if there is a
>> down-convert
>>>> to SD-PAL.
>>>>
>>>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com ,
>> Roger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is better than doing an import of AVCHD on an older system.
>> AVCHD
>>>>> import was a bit flaky.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19 Jan 2013, at 16:13, Terence Curren wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have access to a second computer? Laptop even? If so,
>> install the
>>>>>> free 30 day trial version of MC 6.5 and use it to AMA then
>> convert all
>>>>>> your footage. Then take that to your 5.5 system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
>> , "bartekz" wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -unfortunatly I am limited to MC 5.5.3...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
>> , Robert Lawson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Avid added AMA support for AVCHD files in version 6.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Rob Lawson
>>>>>>>> System Administrator, ACSR ISIS, Windows & Interplay
>>>>>>>> CBS News
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 8:12 AM, bartekz wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear L2,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> here is my scenario:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am about to cut a half hour documentary from about 30
>> hours of
>>>>>>>>> AVCHD
>>>>>>>>> footage, shot on Sony FS100. I need to import into MC
>> 5.5.3 but I
>>>>>>>>> am not
>>>>>>>>> sure exactly what codec is acceptable for a master on
>> PAL-DVCAM
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> internet. I did a few tests and I can see the difference
>> in the
>>>>>>>>> detail
>>>>>>>>> between low-to-high data rate codecs, but will this
>> matter in the
>>>>>>>>> down-convert? My project will be down-converted for
>> broadcast in
>>>>>>>>> SD.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since drive space is an issue for me can I:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -import at DNxHD 36 or Apple ProRes Proxy via FCP and
>> still be
>>>>>>>>> fine for
>>>>>>>>> the final PAL master? The internet file will be
>> compressed H.264
>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>> reason the lossy/offline codecs here are fine?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -or must I import at a higher data rate codec for some
>> reasons of
>>>>>>>>> major
>>>>>>>>> consequence?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -is Clipwrap ok for the conversion here? I believe MC
>> 5.5 can't do
>>>>>>>>> AMA
>>>>>>>>> then transcode, only import.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>
>>>>> With best wishes,
>>>>> Roger Shufflebottom
>>>>> +44 7973 543 660
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (12) |
No comments:
Post a Comment