I'm afraid it shows that they don't know their products anymore. It started the minute Eric Peters left. It went to a Krall.
On 22/08/2012, at 11:07 AM, Shirley Gutierrez wrote:
> It is amazing how stubborn they are on the MC/Symphony distinction, which I find extremely silly at this point. I wonder what's up with that in the corporate brain? Do they just not want to piss off people who bought the more expensive version of Symphony a few years back? Don't they know that we know that everything gets cheaper and more powerful as a matter of course?
>
>
> Shirley
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oliverpetersvidy <oliverpeters@oliverpeters.com>
> To: Avid-L2 <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 4:58 am
> Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Interview
>
>
> Many of the users have been advocating a software consolidation for years. They
> were also arguing to dump Pinnacle YEARS before Avid finally did that. How long
> do you think it will take Avid to come to the same MC/Sym conclusion? Fast and
> bold decisions don't seem to be in the DNA. Slow and don't upset the apple cart
> are more like it. Meanwhile the world moves on.
>
> Oliver
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment