Uncompressed or Compressed That is the Question?
I was recently told by a Post Supervisor that he had always worked uncompressed on his shows. My experience primarily in Avid is everyone works in DNX in HD which is compressed but a strong codec. In FCP I thought Prores was the codec of choice kinda the DNX of the Final Cut world. For short pieces I can see how uncompressed would be viable. In SD I always do 1:1 uncompressed but never in HD for my hour long projects and series. Beside overall drive space doesn't uncompressed put a heavy tax on bandwidth even if the actual processing of the data is more efficient the amount of sheer data seems problematic on a large series scale. Curious what others think.
John Moore
Barking Trout Productions
Studio City, CA
bigfish@pacbell.net
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Thursday, August 2, 2012
[Avid-L2] Uncompressed or Compressed That is the Question?
__._,_.___
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment