Thursday, August 2, 2012

[Avid-L2] Uncompressed or Compressed That is the Question?

 

Uncompressed or Compressed That is the Question?
I was recently told by a Post Supervisor that he had always worked uncompressed on his shows.  My experience primarily in Avid is everyone works in DNX in HD which is compressed but a strong codec.  In FCP I thought Prores was the codec of choice kinda the DNX of the Final Cut world.  For short pieces I can see how uncompressed would be viable.  In SD I always do 1:1 uncompressed but never in HD for my hour long projects and series.  Beside overall drive space doesn't uncompressed put a heavy tax on bandwidth even if the actual processing of the data is more efficient the amount of sheer data seems problematic on a large series scale.  Curious what others think.

John Moore

Barking Trout Productions

Studio City, CA

bigfish@pacbell.net

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:   http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment