I agree- Provided it doesn't delve into politics, which it doesn't seem it is...
JDS
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Jim Feeley <jfeeley@...> wrote:
>
> I bet Deadline Hollywood uses non-union reporters and editors. Well, they probably don't use any editors.
>
> If we don't delve too deeply into "unions are great/evil" and keep the tone fairly civil, I think such discussions can, and perhaps should, take place here.
>
>
>
> Jim "been singed too often to be a pollyanna" Feeley
>
>
>
> On Aug 25, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Shirley Gutierrez wrote:
>
> > Indeed, don't we in fact talk about all sorts of trends that affect our industry and employment opportunities? Issues like outsourcing, rates and budgets, corporate mergers and realignments, marketing strategies, and patents have come up here before. How is this simple posting about a labor dispute beyond the pale?
> >
> > Shirley
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anna Hovhannessian <annahovhannessian@...>
> > To: Avid-L2 <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Sat, Aug 25, 2012 12:11 pm
> > Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Editors, AE's picket, win union contract, benefits
> >
> > I like it. And honestly we don't always stick to tech. It's part of being a
> > community of editors.
> >
> > On Aug 25, 2012, at 2:56 PM, "Mark" <markraudonis@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Can we stick to the tech stuff and not go all political on this board? There's
> > plenty of other
> > > venues for this discussion... don't need it here. Thanks.
> > >
> > > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "paul.hartel" <phartel@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.deadline.com/2012/08/editors-settle-with-syfy-show-hot-set-after-walkout-halted-production-for-3-days/#more-324780
>
No comments:
Post a Comment