I would tell you if i could, but currently i'm busy killing centipedes
running around my screen, reminding me of (and feeling into) a Burroughs
story.
Bouke
VideoToolShed
van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS NIJMEGEN
The Netherlands
+31 24 3553311
www.videotoolshed.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shirley Gutierrez" <guanacaa@aol.com>
To: <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Time to fix the "Find" function!
> That would make sense, and I suspected as much. Except how do I type the
> different types of apostrophes? I only see on character for that on my
> keyboard.
>
>
> Shirley
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bouke <bouke@editb.nl>
> To: Avid-L2 <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Fri, Jul 27, 2012 2:53 am
> Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Time to fix the "Find" function!
>
>
> beside that, there are multiple apostrophes (well, they are different but
> look alike, and have of course different char codes.
> I highly suspect the problem to lie there.
>
> Bouke
>
> VideoToolShed
> van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
> 6512 AS NIJMEGEN
> The Netherlands
> +31 24 3553311
> www.videotoolshed.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger" <rogershuff@yahoo.co.uk>
> To: <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 9:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Time to fix the "Find" function!
>
>
>> Of course we old apostrophe pedants would argue that either that
>> apostrophe is in the wrong place or shouldn't be there at all! Avid is
>> throwing a hissy fit and trying to educate you!
>>
>> On 27 Jul 2012, at 01:27, Shirley Gutierrez wrote:
>>
>>> I'm I just cursed, or is anyone else finding that sometime the Find
>>> window simply refuses to search on certain terms when searching scripts?
>>> This one is "20's" as in "I was in my 20's when it happened." I've tried
>>> deselecting "whole words only" but no dice. I can search on "20," but
>>> that brings up every TC number in the script that contains that term. I
>>> have the raw transcript, and I can search on "20's" just fine in the
>>> context of MS Word - is it possible Word does something better than
>>> Avid?
>>>
>>> I understand the search capabilities in version 6 products are much more
>>> robust than in previous products; I just sometimes wish the search
>>> window
>>> were less of a diva. I've had weird problems with timeline text searches
>>> as well, and I'm starting to lose confidence that a negative search
>>> result really means anything.
>>>
>>> Thanks! Rant over.
>>>
>>> Shirley
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> With best wishes,
>> Roger Shufflebottom
>> +44 7973 543 660
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
>> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
Friday, July 27, 2012
Re: [Avid-L2] Time to fix the "Find" function!
__._,_.___
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment