All very irrelevant for 99 percent of the end users. (arrogant guestimation
from me)
Since we got virtually unlimited video tracks and lots of matting / keying
stuff, all that is needed is there.
Perhaps not as hip as possible, but it gets the job done.
(and probably sometimes even better than the high end stuff where people are
blind to options, just work with the stuff that is in their high end box)
(well, make that a sure thing in my little shop...)
Bouke
VideoToolShed
van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS NIJMEGEN
The Netherlands
+31 24 3553311
www.videotoolshed.com
For large files:
http://dropbox.yousendit.com/BoukeVahl998172
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Quinsee-Jover" <tony@hdheaven.co.uk>
To: <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Symphony CC overview video
DS does it pretty well ... Oh...
Sent by magic over t'interweb
On 2 May 2012, at 20:53, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@aol.com> wrote:
> Almost every color corrector handles the secondaries better than symphony.
> Maybe someday it will get fixed...
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "ksirul" <kenavid2@...> wrote:
>>
>> Sometimes just another layer with an animatte works better. The
>> Selective CC in DS, BTW is incredibly more powerful as you have full
>> control over the key, feathering and masking of the effect.
>>
>> KEN
>>
>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Dylan Reeve <dylan@> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah, I struggle with the secondaries. I often find that I'm unable to
>>> get
>>> a satisfactory "key" (in quotes, because it's not really a key as such)
>>> and
>>> end up with fringe pixels either uncorrected and contrasting oddly, or
>>> jumping/boiling/twitter/flickering in and out of the correction. There
>>> are
>>> definitely times when I do use it, such as a very subtle saturation
>>> reduction on a large solidly coloured area like a wall, sign or shirt -
>>> but
>>> they are definitely not as powerful or flexible as people are used to
>>> from
>>> secondaries in other tools.
>>>
>>> Dylan Reeve
>>> http://dylanreeve.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:28 AM, timmangini <tim_mangini@> wrote:
>>>
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nice job Dylan. Very thorough explanation but it doesn't go on too
>>>> long.
>>>> One comment, we use secondaries a lot in our shop. Perhaps 70% of the
>>>> shots
>>>> in an hour-long doc. So we find that feature to be an extremely
>>>> important
>>>> differentiator from MC.
>>>>
>>>> tim
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Dylan Reeve <dylan@> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I made this overview video about Symphony CC and how it differs most
>>>>>> significantly (in my opinion) from Media Composer.
>>>>>> http://vimeo.com/dylanreeve/symphonycc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I probably made some drastic mistakes or something - so if you notice
>>>> any
>>>>>> do let me know and I'll correct them or something.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dylan Reeve
>>>>>> http://dylanreeve.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment