OK, so then the question would be: should Avid spend R&D on creating a new color corrector (when there's industry standards like BaseLight, Resolve, Nucoda, Scratch out there), or should they just open up MC for others to plug into? Again, I feel the latter would be better for the product, whereas I feel that the first is what they're after.
On 22 apr. 2012, at 18:14, Terence Curren wrote:
> My guess is you are giving the AVX architecture more credit than it deserves. I constantly hear from third party vendors all the things they can't do because of AVX's limitations.
__._,_.___
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment