I've been advised in the past to add a tape name to ama clips to facilitate relinking later. Giving the ama'd clips the same name as the bin they are in seems to work well for us in the few cases we've dealt with ama. With Red is this still an advisable step? Are there any drawbacks to this approach?
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@...> wrote:
>
> The ideal workflow is to mount the red files via AMA, then transcode for offline. When done, relink to the original RAW files and render out to whatever you want.
>
> In your case, what you want to do is export an EDL to RedCineX. Relink to the RAW files. Then do an AAF output with media transcoded to whatever Avid flavor you want. Dump those files into your Avid Mediafiles folder, import the AAF, relink, and relink your sequence.
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, mike cardeiro <mcardeiro@> wrote:
> >
> > We have been doing more and more stuff on red.
> >
> > Whenever we get red footage I transcode all of it to hi rez dnx for editing....but it obviously this takes up a lot of unnecessary space. when we had our first red job I tried transcoding at offline resolution building a sequence and uprezing with batch import, the problem is when I try to batch import a seq of these transoced files, the avid is trying to find the transcode file and not reimporting the original red file.
> >
> >
> > am I missing something on this type of workflow? how can I build a seq of transcoded red files then batch import those at a higher res? (I am on mc 5.0.3)
> >
> >
> > Mike Cardeiro
> > Editor/Animator
> > D4 Creative Group - Philadelphia, PA
> > 215-483-4555
> > -------------------------------
> > Resume | samples
> > http://www.michaelcardeiro.com/resume/
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
No comments:
Post a Comment