If we end up using the Red we would definitely transcode to an offline resolution my question is why the ama'd clip looks different than the transcoded clip?
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "jeffsengpiehl" <jeffsengpiehl@...> wrote:
>
> the workflow would be to Transcode then. No edit system can slog around RED via AMA in multicamera groups. The CPU's won't handle it, and it grinds everyone to insanity.
>
> JDS
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, John Moore <bigfish@> wrote:
> >
> > I think I know what is happening but I'm remotely helping out today while sorting through our Red workflow tests. I'm told the transcoded ama'd Red clips look different than the ama'd clips. I'm assuming this points to a difference in the source settings parameter that you get to by right clicking the ama'd red clip and the media creations tab that controls transcodes. I'm assuming they haven't messed with these settings so I would guess they are at default, if there is such a thing. Seems messed up that what you see in the ama'd clip is different in look than the transcoded clip. Of course resolution etc... will change but is this normal. This may seem silly but is there a preset or something in the Red workflow that will just pass the image through in a unity like way so the image stays looking relatively consistant until color correction? I know the power of the Red is in part the ability to manipulate all the raw data but I'm just
> > looking for a unity level workflow like I have when we shoot multicam to HDCam tape in a production truck. Is this too much to ask for with the Red technology?
> >
> > John Moore
> >
> > Barking Trout Productions
> >
> > Studio City, CA
> >
> > bigfish@
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
No comments:
Post a Comment