Well, Terry's comment about the delay with hi quality interlaced footage is an issue. We work on a lot of interlaced stuff and that can be a problem with sync, etc. I'm sure there are ways to adjust delay times but that could require extra gear (audio delays) and so forth.
KEN
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "SP" <sppomerantz@...> wrote:
>
> I admit, I haven't actually seen the BVM, but I've been doing a lot of work on the PVM the last couple of months, and it's pretty freaking fantastic. Maybe there are good reasons from an engineering standpoint, but I'm not sure how much better it could get, picture wise.
>
> Steve Pomerantz
> www.stevepomerantzeditorial.com
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Greg Huson <Greg@> wrote:
> >
> > Not to be too sarcastic, but one difference is that I would never pay for a bvm.
> >
> > ________________________
> > Greg Huson
> > Secret Headquarters, Inc
> > Greg (at) SecretHQ.com
> > www.SecretHQ.com
> > DigitalServicsStation.com
> >
> > On Apr 23, 2012, at 10:44 AM, "ksirul" <kenavid2@> wrote:
> >
> > > OK, post NAB folks. So we're looking to upgrade 2 of our BVM32 CRTs. I'm setting up some demos of Flanders and Sonys. What is the major difference between the Sony BVM and PVM OLED monitors?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > KEN
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
No comments:
Post a Comment