I have not worked with the C300 but if that is naming scheme of that
camera that is sad, pathetic even. For that price Canon could not come
up with a system to prevent file name clashing - similar to the P2 and
XDCAM formats? Wow.
But yes, having the same TC, file name and shoot date will like trip AMA up.
On 3/31/2012 1:11 PM, Michael Brockington wrote:
> Just to be clear, I was referring to duplicate names at the OS level,
> generated by the camera.
>
> I was recently working on a 2-camera shoot using C300 cameras. A and B
> cameras generated the same filenames, using their default settings
> (AA0001, AA0002, etc.) Relinking a cut sequence to the AMA clips proved
> difficult -- some parts of the sequence relinked and others did not. I
> attribute it to the duplicate filenames.
>
> Cheers,
> --Michael
>
> On 12-03-31 1:32 AM, trevatpc wrote:
>> I think there's some confusion over clip 'filename' at OS level and
>> the entry in the 'name' column once in Avid.
>>
>> The latter you can change at will. The former is best left alone.
>>
>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>,
>> Michael Brockington<brocking@...> wrote:
>>> I would be extremely wary of duplicate clip names. If you are relinking
>>> to AMA clips, that's typically based on clip name, is it not?
>>>
>>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment