'I assume the QC person just does not know what 1080i/59.94 means exactly.'
...or the person who wrote the slate does not know the acronym for frames per second is written with capital F
BG
www.finale.tv
--- On Mon, 3/12/12, Dom Q. Silverio <domqsilverio@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Dom Q. Silverio <domqsilverio@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Standards
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, March 12, 2012, 2:22 PM
I agree but the point was there is nothing technically wrong. There was no
standard being broken.
Even if you are being pedantic the slate is still correct.
I understand if it was written "1080i/29.97"
Then yes, that would be wrong but it was written as
fps: 29.97
I assume the QC person just does not know what 1080i/59.94 means exactly.
Dom Q. Silverio
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Pat Horridge <pat@horridge.org.uk> wrote:
> Yup sounds about right had tape bounces for even less than that.
> Broadcasters are often very strict as once you start to let standards and
> requirements slip before long you have none!
>
> Sent from Pat's iPhone
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment