In fact, more than Unity in that one timeline can be
edited and it's updated in the other editor's screen, without the bin/copy/lock
method of Unity.
Wow! That sounds pretty sexy, but talk about comedy! It reminds a little of those student driver cars, with an extra brake on the passenger (instructor) side. Go! No! Stop! What if two editors trim the same cut in opposite directions at once? Who wins?
Shirley
-----Original Message-----
From: oliverpetersvidy <oliverpeters@oliverpeters.com>
To: Avid-L2 <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sat, Mar 17, 2012 12:05 pm
Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: OT: Semi-viral video pumping Premiere Pro (the next version)
> johnrobmoore wrote:
> My take on Premiere is it lacks anything like Avid's collaboration ability.
Premiere's project sharing is at the same level of FCP 7 - more or less.
Multiple editors working with copies of files linked to common media. There are
broadcast news outlets at the local level who are currently using Premiere Pro
connected to their standard server systems. There are plenty of installations
that can work perfectly well in this sort of configuration. For example, feature
films, TV promos, commercials, broadcast news, etc.
True Unity-style project collaboration is still an Avid strong point, although
EditShare has already shown (last year's NAB) Lightworks working in a completely
collaborative fashion. In fact, more than Unity in that one timeline can be
edited and it's updated in the other editor's screen, without the bin/copy/lock
method of Unity.
- Oliver
------------------------------------
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment