In the linear edit world, the out frame number, and the in frame number are the SAME number.
In film, the outgoing frame and the next frame are two different edge code numbers.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "bouke" <bouke@...> wrote:
>
> well, as i've stated before, no lineair editor i've ever worked with could
> do this. In is first frame to insert, out is the frame NOT to be inserted
> anymore.
> What stuff did you work with?
>
> Bouke
>
> VideoToolShed
> van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
> 6512 AS NIJMEGEN
> The Netherlands
> +31 24 3553311
> www.videotoolshed.com
> For large files:
> http://dropbox.yousendit.com/BoukeVahl998172
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Terence Curren" <tcurren@...>
> To: <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:22 PM
> Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Center Duration 1 fame 1 frame longer duration than
> time code calculator?
>
>
> When I went from film to linear I had a hard time getting the screwed up way
> they count frames. How can the out frame and the in frame be the same
> number?
>
> Can't work in film, and doesn't work that way in Avid, only in linear
> editing insanity can two objects occupy the same place in space.
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, John Moore <bigfish@> wrote:
> >
> > This is probably true regardless of the project type but in an HD 23.976
> > 1080P project if I mark in at 1:00:00:00 and mark out 1:03:00:00 I get a
> > center duration of 3:00:01. If I subtract the mark in from the mark out
> > using the time code calculator I get 3:00. I know I always end an act on a
> > ;29 frame in the drop frame 29.97 world so I think I understand what's
> > going on. I guess I should treat the frame before the mark in e.g.
> > 00:59:59:23 as the time code I should subtract from the end time code when
> > going the time code calculator route. I just don't remember ever having
> > done that in a 29.97 df world but maybe I just didn't notice or think
> > about it.
> >
> > John Moore
> >
> > Barking Trout Productions
> >
> > Studio City, CA
> >
> > bigfish@
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
No comments:
Post a Comment