Looks like FCPX. :-0
(Ducking)
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Knut A. Helgeland" <knut@...> wrote:
>
> More specifically, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEpLER3cFBI
>
> http://www.wevideo.com/
>
> K
>
> On 7. des. 2011, at 17.11, George Loch wrote:
>
> > Hmmm. I think Youtube should feel slighted. Their online editor was
> > completely ignored.
> >
> > -gl
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Jim Feeley <jfeeley@...> wrote:
> >
> >> :-)
> >>
> >> But then, Adobe Premiere Pro won the Best Video Editing Application
> >> poll lifehacker ran in conjunction with the article (towards bottom of
> >> the article, before the comments). And scanning the comments, readers
> >> want a similar in-depth investigation into free editing apps (note
> >> that Lightworks gets an honorable mention at the end of the article).
> >>
> >> Jim
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 7, 2011, at 7:04 AM, Terence Curren wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Proving once again that Apple knows it's market.
> >>>
> >>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "SP" <sppomerantz@> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> "Power doesn't come cheap though, Final Cut Pro will set you back
> >>> $299.99."
> >>>>
> >>>> yup. nothing left to argue about.
> >>>>
> >>>> Steve Pomerantz
> >>>> www.stevepomerantzeditorial.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Jim Feeley <jfeeley@> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Our work here is done. I mean, after reading this article there's
> >>>>> nothing left to argue about or say:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://lifehacker.com/5864841/five-best-video-editors
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Boy, what a relief.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jim
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
> >> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
No comments:
Post a Comment