Thes are all good points, however, I need to clarify a couple of things:
--- On Sat, 11/5/11, Job ter Burg (L2B) <Job_L2@terburg.com> wrote:
From: Job ter Burg (L2B) <Job_L2@terburg.com>
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] BMD Resolve on Avid DX Hardware
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, November 5, 2011, 1:17 PM
DX hardware still offers some bonuses.
The following are NOT supported with Open I/O:
• Ancillary Data
• LTC I/O (Timecode over RS-422 is supported)
• Audio Punch-In
• Full Frame Stereoscopic 3D Simultaneous Capture/Digital Cut
• Hardware Codec Encode/Decode
• Multiple I/O Hardware Support in CPU
• Universal Mastering
• Thin Raster Timeline Modes
And in the words of Shane Ross, the DX advantages are:
- HD-RGB capture through dual link
- DNxHD encoding (dual stream) Hardware encoding, built into the box
- AVC-Intra encoding (dual stream), hardware encoding, built into the box
- Both DNxHD and AVC-Intra encoders in the box at the same time
- Full frame stereoscopic (3D) capture/monitor/output
- Thin raster format support (meaning that it takes the burden of stretching out anamorphic footage to full screen off of the computer and shoulders the task itself)
- Dual live sync
- Always active analog and digital audio monitoring
On 5 nov. 2011, at 21:10, Bogdan Grigoresco wrote:
> Try to compete with BMD DeckLink HD extreme (995$), even when Nitris DX is down to 5,500.
------------------------------------
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Saturday, November 5, 2011
Re: [Avid-L2] BMD Resolve on Avid DX Hardware
__._,_.___
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment