Saturday, June 25, 2011

Re: [Avid-L2] Why fcpx is bad for avid

 


I didn't get that comment either. There's no FCP finishing in my market, unless the alternative is not finishing at all.

Shirley

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Hullfish <steve4lists@veralith.com>
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, Jun 25, 2011 4:49 pm
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Why fcpx is bad for avid

FCP SUCKS to finish on. Practically every professional I know, who's willing to
CUT on FCP, moves to some other finishing solution, whether it's Symphony or
Quantel or Smoke - especially SMOKE.

I can see the value in sliding stuff around in FCP's timeline if you want to do
an off-line and you love timeline editing, but finishing? That has to be a joke.

Steve Hullfish
contributor: www.provideocoalition.com
author: "The Art and Technique of Digital Color Correction"

> "Fcp is by far the most flexible and fast system compared to MC to complete
> finishing tasks."

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/

If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell
phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next
cell bill.Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at:   http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/

If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment