Thursday, May 19, 2011

Re: [Avid-L2] Re: transcode vs import

 

Doesn't seem like the architecture would allow for that.
C.A.Magid
RTVF

________________________________
From: johnrobmoore <bigfish@pacbell.net>
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, May 19, 2011 8:37:44 PM
Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: transcode vs import

I was told no alpha support a while ago but I don't know if that has changed.
Somebody tried it 6 or so months ago and told me it didn't work.

--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Greg Huson <Greg@...> wrote:
>
> Haven't tried it with that in mind, but I don't think so. Running log output
>and all the other machines are off just now...
>
>
>
> gh
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Greg Huson
> Secret Headquarters, Inc
> Post Production / Production
> Culver City, CA
> 323 677 2092
> www.DigitalServiceStation.com
> greg (at) SecretHQ.com
> facebook.com/greg.huson
> www.SecretHQ.com
>
>
>
> On May 19, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Chris wrote:
>
> > Does AMA support alpha?
> >
> > Not near a machine to test.
> >
> > But since you mentioned graphics via after effects...
> >
> > C. A. Magid
> > RTVF
> >
> > On May 19, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Greg Huson <Greg@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Frank was discussing that at editors lounge last week. Yes, that's what he
>said, too. Newer code. However, today, I test that theory going from h.264 to
>2:1 SD, and did not have the 'faster' experience. That's just one case, though-
>usually it does go much faster to transcode from AMA than to import. And, in
>fact, some things I don't even bother to transcode- for example, if you render
>out of after effects to an avid QuickTime codec- AMA saves the time of even a
>'fast import,' with no performance hit I can see.
> > >
> > > Greg (at) secrethq.com
> > > Greg Huson
> > > Secret Headquarters, Inc
> > > www.DigitalServiceStation.com
> > > www.SecretHQ.com
> > > iPhone
> > >
> > > On May 19, 2011, at 2:41 PM, "loso007" <loso007@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > AMA is not only faster, but much faster for me. I suppose AMA is using
>all the CPU power the box has, where as the traditional import just uses one.
>Can anyone confirm this??
> > > >
> > > > Loren
> > > >
> > > > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Lou Wirth <loutv@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Which is faster? AMA link and transcode QT or import?
> > > > > I know I could do a test but I'm in the middle of a long import. ;-)
> > > > > Lou
> > > > > Lou Wirth Productions
> > > > > 500Tamal Plaza, Suite 522
> > > > > Corte Madera, CA 94925
> > > > > www.louwirth.com
> > > > > 415-924-9411p
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at:   http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/

If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Find useful articles and helpful tips on living with Fibromyalgia. Visit the Fibromyalgia Zone today!

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment