Terry,
I agree with that. However, by now, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. The statement that there will be "worked on ways to distinguish" only means something to me because they somehow managed to convince _you_. By itself, the statement has no impact on my perception of the product.
What has been lacking is not just development, what has been lacking is a vision.
On the forums, I stated "we need a roadmap for Symphony". No replies from anyone at Avid. None. Along came NAB. Apparently, no Symphonies in the booth.
So, while they may be working on "ways to distinguish" MC and Symph, there's no way for me to get as much as a single clue where they are planning to go and if that is going to make any business sense for me. In the meantime, I have paid premiums on upgrades and support contracts for several years (only last month I ranted so much that they dropped the upgrade price difference between Symph and MC).
I want to know where they want the product to go. And I'm not the only one.
http://community.avid.com/forums/t/94058.aspx
Job.
On 17 mei 2011, at 06:43, Terence Curren wrote:
> if you expect Avid to immediately undo 10 years of neglect in development while only charging $2,500 for the software (995 for FCP users), then you are doomed to be disappointed.
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment