Good lord man, have you not discovered 3.5" floppies yet? They're the
future, I'm telling you. No one will ever need more than 1.44MB on a
single disk.
D.
On 13 May 2011 00:59, ksirul <kenavid2@glueedit.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm getting some studdery video trying to play back 4k Red files from a 5 1/2" floppy disk. WTF?
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, David Ross <speckydave@...> wrote:
> >
> > I totally agree.
> > Though the original poster was asking for opinion on a 3.5" desktop
> > drive, it's cheap and non-raid, so its performance is probably little
> > better than the cheapo 2.5" drives you're talking about and 40MB/s is
> > going to be about the best you can expect over FW800. A quick test of
> > a similar domestic Western Digital drive I have here confirms this.
> > The same files copied onto the same drive from the same source over
> > USB 2 gets me a transfer rate of 27MB/s.
> >
> > So hey; FW800 sucks less in my book.
> >
> > D.
> >
> >
> > On 12 May 2011 21:56, Rupert Watson <rupert@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have never seen a single 2.5" drive of the kind you get in cheapo
> > > little portable enclosures get above 40MB/s on ANY connection. Be it
> > > USB, 400 or 800 M/bit firewire. They are all a sack when it comes to
> > > transfer rates but a million cheap arsed producers can't be wrong!
> > >
> > > Rupert Watson
> > > +44 7787 554 801
> > > www.root6.com
> > >
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment