Friday, May 20, 2011

[Avid-L2] Re: Hopeful news for Symphony

 

You're being facetious and fun but the reason is overhead in one program. You can't have one app do "everything" and do it well. Usethe Best tool for the job at hand.. you don't have to fire up the air compressor, run the air lines and get the couplers out when all you need for this job is a simple framing hammer.

JDS

--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "oliverpetersvidy" <oliverpeters@> wrote:
>
>
> << So again, why Symphony? I'm in the camp that says the product software should be the same and Avid's hardware should differentiate MC versus Symphony.>>
>
> Why Color, Motion, etc as separate products? Shouldn't they all be in one application then? How about premiere and After Effects? Shouldn't they just roll them into one? And Discrete should get rid of separate products. Smoke on Mac should have everything the rest of the line has. Why have any differentiation?
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at:   http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/

If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment