And where exactly do they show their finished product at 10 bit RGB 4:4:4?
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Fabrice Altman" <fabricealtman@...> wrote:
>
> I'll have to disagree on this. My issue is that 4:2:2 has been designed
> around live action. With graphics, it's impact is visible to the naked eye in some circumstances.
> Higher end clients or low budget ones, a corporate logo is their baby, that's what they care about, and not really the "2K, 4K, 4:4:4" bit.
> With file based workflows, they can now be really picky about pixels...
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@> wrote:
> >
> > I wish! The reality is that the higher end clients know they are fine with 4:2:2 DNxHD. It's always the really low budget guys who have to do "2K, 4K, 4:4:4 because that's the best!" even though it will be lucky to get a DVD release...
> >
>
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment