I'll have to disagree on this. My issue is that 4:2:2 has been designed
around live action. With graphics, it's impact is visible to the naked eye in some circumstances.
Higher end clients or low budget ones, a corporate logo is their baby, that's what they care about, and not really the "2K, 4K, 4:4:4" bit.
With file based workflows, they can now be really picky about pixels...
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@...> wrote:
>
> I wish! The reality is that the higher end clients know they are fine with 4:2:2 DNxHD. It's always the really low budget guys who have to do "2K, 4K, 4:4:4 because that's the best!" even though it will be lucky to get a DVD release...
>
__._,_.___
Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment