But why thunderbolt to use it as an interactive display? I thought you
could already do that wirelessly, or with the existing connector into
a USB port? (see Tangent Wave vWave-Lite app)
And if you're going to daisy-chain it between a 4K camera and your
storage, apart from the fact it would then need two thunderbolt
connections, it would also need the iPad to be able to support your 4K
data stream, or it becomes a bottleneck. Or am I missing something?
By the way, I'm totally excited about thunderbolt. I'm just not sure
that the iPad is an applicable host.
D.
On 3 March 2011 20:19, Terence Curren <tcurren@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, David Ross <speckydave@...> wrote:
>
> <<Not sure why you would even need Thunderbolt on an iPad, >>
>
> How about:
>
> Makes it an interactive display device for any system you can think of.
>
> Allows you to daisy chain it in any workflow, in line from an HD/ 2K / 4K camera to the storage on set for example. Controls the pipeline and acts as a monitor or monitor feed.
>
> That's two right off the top of my head. Thunderbolt has the potential to change how we do things in a lot of different ways. With one cable daisy chaining it all together. It may change how we think about every tool we use.
>
No comments:
Post a Comment