Very well put!
We don't seem to have any problem agreeing with each other on this one; now, if only someone at Avid agreed with us, perhaps something would actually happen.
Frank, do you still read the list?
Shirley
-----Original Message-----
From: blafarm <blafarm@yahoo.com>
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, Feb 19, 2011 7:39 pm
Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Symphony owners?
Agreed.
It is utterly depressing that in the year 2011 -- the only material
differentiator between MC and Symphony is still Advanced Color Correction and
Universal Mastering.
It is also utterly depressing that in year 2011 -- both of these platforms are
still wallowing in obsolete toolsets that are over 10 years old. I mean --
really -- what other software company is selling 10 year old functionality?
I won't go into the gory details of what is wrong with these two products --
except to say that if Avid is unaware of their shortcomings-- we are all in deep
trouble.
What I will say is my opinion that there is simply no reason for these two
products to not be merged into one.
And for that one surviving product to have herculean developmental resources
thrown at it -- to overcome the past 10 years of squandered opportunity -- that
would have allowed Avid to be an innovative leader -- and not an embarrasing
follower.
------------------------------------
Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
Individual Email | Traditional
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment