Nigel,
IMO, the Q is not so much if there is any development, but why Symphony is still a separate product.
Can you explain why Symphony owners have to keep on paying premiums for every upgrade that brings nothing more than an MC owner gains?
I can't.
Job
Sent from my iPhone
On 20 feb. 2011, at 13:23, "Nigel Gourley" <avid-l@outpostfacilities.co.uk> wrote:
> Just to even out the balance a bit I must say I almost totally disagree.
>
>
>
> Without going on and on for example..
>
>
>
> what other software company is selling 10 year old functionality?
>
> Think Word, excel, outlook, etc etc.
>
>
>
> I think it's pretty good at the moment the pace of MC advancement. Almost
> too quick for us to keep pace.
>
>
>
>
>
> N
>
>
>
> From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Shirley Gutierrez
> Sent: 20 February 2011 05:27
> To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Symphony owners?
>
>
>
>
>
> Very well put!
>
> We don't seem to have any problem agreeing with each other on this one; now,
> if only someone at Avid agreed with us, perhaps something would actually
> happen.
>
> Frank, do you still read the list?
>
> Shirley
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blafarm <blafarm@yahoo.com <mailto:blafarm%40yahoo.com> >
> To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sat, Feb 19, 2011 7:39 pm
> Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Symphony owners?
>
> Agreed.
>
> It is utterly depressing that in the year 2011 -- the only material
>
> differentiator between MC and Symphony is still Advanced Color Correction
> and
>
> Universal Mastering.
>
> It is also utterly depressing that in year 2011 -- both of these platforms
> are
>
> still wallowing in obsolete toolsets that are over 10 years old. I mean --
>
> really -- what other software company is selling 10 year old functionality?
>
> I won't go into the gory details of what is wrong with these two products --
>
>
> except to say that if Avid is unaware of their shortcomings-- we are all in
> deep
>
> trouble.
>
> What I will say is my opinion that there is simply no reason for these two
>
> products to not be merged into one.
>
> And for that one surviving product to have herculean developmental resources
>
>
> thrown at it -- to overcome the past 10 years of squandered opportunity --
> that
>
> would have allowed Avid to be an innovative leader -- and not an embarrasing
>
>
> follower.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at:
> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
>
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
>
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2-digest%40yahoogroups.com>
>
> Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Avid-L2-fullfeatured%40yahoogroups.com>
>
> Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Avid-L2-unsubscribe%40yahoogroups.com>
>
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment