Ah that's exactly the point of my post.To express a point of view you
haven't heard yet!
N
From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
switthaus
Sent: 20 February 2011 12:37
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Symphony owners?
I'm not sure that these are brands that Avid wants to be compared with. Good
brands? Sure, but not exactly cutting edge. I don't see the competitive
situation Word has with Pages, for example as being anything at all like
Avid has with Apple, Autoscreet, Q, etc.
MC advancement too quick for us to keep up with? That is one that I have not
heard yet!
sw
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com> , "Nigel
Gourley" <avid-l@...> wrote:
>
> what other software company is selling 10 year old functionality?
>
> Think Word, excel, outlook, etc etc.
>
>
>
> I think it's pretty good at the moment the pace of MC advancement. Almost
> too quick for us to keep pace.
>
>
>
>
>
> N
>
>
>
> From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
> Shirley Gutierrez
> Sent: 20 February 2011 05:27
> To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Symphony owners?
>
>
>
>
>
> Very well put!
>
> We don't seem to have any problem agreeing with each other on this one;
now,
> if only someone at Avid agreed with us, perhaps something would actually
> happen.
>
> Frank, do you still read the list?
>
> Shirley
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blafarm <blafarm@... <mailto:blafarm%40yahoo.com> >
> To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sat, Feb 19, 2011 7:39 pm
> Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Symphony owners?
>
> Agreed.
>
> It is utterly depressing that in the year 2011 -- the only material
>
> differentiator between MC and Symphony is still Advanced Color Correction
> and
>
> Universal Mastering.
>
> It is also utterly depressing that in year 2011 -- both of these platforms
> are
>
> still wallowing in obsolete toolsets that are over 10 years old. I mean --
>
> really -- what other software company is selling 10 year old
functionality?
>
> I won't go into the gory details of what is wrong with these two products
--
>
>
> except to say that if Avid is unaware of their shortcomings-- we are all
in
> deep
>
> trouble.
>
> What I will say is my opinion that there is simply no reason for these two
>
> products to not be merged into one.
>
> And for that one surviving product to have herculean developmental
resources
>
>
> thrown at it -- to overcome the past 10 years of squandered opportunity --
> that
>
> would have allowed Avid to be an innovative leader -- and not an
embarrasing
>
>
> follower.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at:
> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
>
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
>
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2-digest%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:Avid-L2-digest%40yahoogroups.com>
>
> Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Avid-L2-fullfeatured%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:Avid-L2-fullfeatured%40yahoogroups.com>
>
> Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Avid-L2-unsubscribe%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:Avid-L2-unsubscribe%40yahoogroups.com>
>
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment