The example I used was real, but not totally encompassing of reasons why
trimming a subclip beyond what was once thought to be logical limits
might be required. This falls under the heading of stuff I'd really
rather not have to think about when I'm already sitting in front of a
computer.
Best,
--
Pete O
POP Pictures
Orlando
On 2/25/2011 7:59 AM, switthaus wrote:
>
> Pete -
>
> In FCP: When extending the length of a subclip in the timeline: Your
> subclip will keep the same name, both in the timeline and bin. It just
> changes back to a copy of the original clip in the bin with the same
> IO points for the original subclip. This is when I extend in the
> timeline. If I were to do this from the browser, I would simply Remove
> Subclip Limits, move the outpoint and make another subclip. It ain't
> great, for sure as you end up with the original subclip, which is now
> a clip, the original clip and the new subclip. Oih!.
>
> Haven't done it much because "takes" in my spot world are pretty cut
> and dry where they start and stop and I am pretty liberal with out
> points when subclipping other types of programs, Avid or FCP.
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Pete Opotowsky <popix@...> wrote:
> >
> > I
> > because I'm old and feeble- I end a couple of them short. So I want to
> > trim them out in the cut sequence, and match frame to the sub and trim
> > past its limit, but doing so turns it back to the orig master clip.
> So I
> > no longer have a subclip in my sequence telling me which take it was. I
> > don't think I'd like that
> >
> > This said, I don't think I like the way it works now either.
> >
> > --
> > Pete O
> > POP Pictures
> > Orlando
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/24/2011 1:25 PM, Shirley Gutierrez wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > You know, I haven't really given that much thought, but probably
> > > matching back to the master would be best in this case. I can't
> recall
> > > the last time I tried this in MC, so I'm not sure what it does, but
> > > even if I landed on the sub, just match framing again will get me the
> > > master anyway. FCP does this now too, though in a slightly
> different way.
> > >
> > > In any case, if I'm matching framing to media I've trimmed in to the
> > > original sub, chances are I want back to the master clip anyway.
> > >
> > > Shirley
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pete Opotowsky <popix@... <mailto:popix%40cfl.rr.com>>
> > > To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Thu, Feb 24, 2011 9:47 am
> > > Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] FR:Subclip behavior was: New FCP? Hmmm.....
> > >
> > > So if you tried to match frame into the extended area what should
> happen?
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Pete O
> > >
> > > POP Pictures
> > >
> > > Orlando
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
--
Pete O
POP Pictures
Orlando
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment