I'm actually an advocate of the MC behavior, allow me to trim, but leave the subclip in the bin alone. That way the application only does what I need it to do and what I'm asking it to do. If I really need a new subclip, I can make one.
I think Oliver is undoubtedly right that this issue has not been resolved (or even recognized as an issue) in the next "jaw dropping" release.
Best,
Shirley
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Opotowsky <popix@cfl.rr.com>
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, Feb 24, 2011 5:56 am
Subject: [Avid-L2] FR:Subclip behavior was: New FCP? Hmmm.....
Better behavior?: "When I chose 'remove Subclip Limits', allow the trim
beyond the original subclip start/end and upon leaving trim mode modify
the start/end to the subclip to the new trimmed limits"
--
Pete O
POP Pictures
Orlando
On 2/23/2011 6:11 PM, Shirley Gutierrez wrote:
>
>
> It may not be true anymore. I'll test it in a bit here, but about five
> years ago "Remove Subclip Limits" made the subclip identical in
> duration and TC start to its parent master clip. In other words, it
> was no longer a subclip - just a master clip with a different name. I
> took this as evidence of some serious design dementia over at Apple.
>
> I hope my explanation made sense this time. Something this utterly
> lame is pretty hard to grasp; the mind reels.
>
> Shirley
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
Individual Email | Traditional
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment