I think in my case it's a new long form documentary. One main editor and the
producer will have another duplicate drive around so he can view cuts and
selects. AMA doesn't sound like a good idea because I don't care how careful
they are I'm sure I'll be called when something doesn't link.
I can see for short projects it's great I've had other clients work that way
with the Sony Ex footage. I guess my workflow for this situation would be take
BU field drive and AMA footage into system then Transcode material to main
active storage. Then BU that storage to a secondary drive for the Prod to view
stuff on at home. Does this make the most sense?
Jason Gillet
Editor/Engineer
Moving Pictures NYC
________________________________
From: Knut A. Helgeland <knut@toxic.no>
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, January 21, 2011 1:55:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: AVC-Intra Workflow
AVC-Intra support preceded AMA, via the P2 import. I've done several projects
using AVC-Intra natively without AMA and without issues, although none longer
than music video length.
K
On 21. jan. 2011, at 17.22, Terence Curren wrote:
> DON'T use AMA for long form. Too many issues with relinking as time goes on.
>Use AMA to log and then transcode your footage to DNxHD and never look back.
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Jason Gillet <jsg5403@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was curious how people are working with AVC-Intra. I haven't actually cut
>> anything in this format long form and I wanted to know if it's best to load as
>
>> AMA and work with it that way or are people converting it to DNXHD once it's
>> loaded.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jason Gillet
>> Editor/Engineer
>> Moving Pictures NYC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at:
>http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment