ah, i see...
My point was, if one uses Marvin, there is of course a third party involved,
but the whole workflow 'should' be the same as you describe.
(Except you're not the one setting the first look.)
And offloading has to be done as well, as making viewing DVD's / files, so
IMHO it is a neat system.
Bouke
VideoToolShed
van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS NIJMEGEN
The Netherlands
+31 24 3553311
www.videotoolshed.com
For large files:
http://dropbox.yousendit.com/BoukeVahl998172
----- Original Message -----
From: "Job ter Burg (L2B)" <Job_L2@terburg.com>
To: <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Alexa
But all of this still means the same thing as I said earlier, right: no
color corrected conversion without a third party app?
The ideal would be I get useable files from an Alexa shoot, that can come in
through AMA, and the colors will look as they were intended on set.
Subsequent transcoding then has this look baked in.
This all is not substituting anything less than 35mm one-light TK or Red
with color settings. Anything less is a step backwards.
J.
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 24, 2011, at 14:49, "Bouke" <bouke@editb.nl> wrote:
> Nah, but you would offline with them if there was no alternative :-)
>
> But really, contact Guus. I don't know about the current version of
> Marvin,
> he does.
>
>
> Bouke
>
> VideoToolShed
> van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
> 6512 AS NIJMEGEN
> The Netherlands
> +31 24 3553311
> www.videotoolshed.com
> For large files:
> http://dropbox.yousendit.com/BoukeVahl998172
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Job ter Burg (L2B)" <Job_L2@terburg.com>
> To: <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 2:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Alexa
>
>
> I wouldn't consider SD offline on digital cinema projects.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 24 jan. 2011, at 13:45, "Bouke" <bouke@editb.nl> wrote:
>
>> Oliver,
>> Just checked... (I don't edit with them, i just got a few to work out the
>> anomalies...)
>> The testclips i got are Prores 4444 for the 'real' stuff, and a ProRes SD
>> for Proxy.
>> (i assume they both came from the cam, since the guy asking me works on
>> set
>> with these files)
>>
>> Now in the 'old' version (meaning, a couple of months ago), the 4444
>> files
>> were locked.
>> That means, no QT magic on them.
>> Turning off the lock would render the files corrupt by even reading their
>> TC.
>> That made the offline proxies kinda usefull...
>>
>>
>> Bouke
>>
>> VideoToolShed
>> van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
>> 6512 AS NIJMEGEN
>> The Netherlands
>> +31 24 3553311
>> www.videotoolshed.com
>> For large files:
>> http://dropbox.yousendit.com/BoukeVahl998172
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "oliverpetersvidy" <oliverpeters@oliverpeters.com>
>> To: <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 1:30 PM
>> Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Alexa
>>
>>
>>> Bouke wrote:
>>> AFAIK, Alexa writes ProRes proxies. (with a
>>> few problems that 'should' be
>>> ironed out in the last cam firmware)
>>
>> These aren't proxies, but in fact full-quality, master files. Unless you
>> use
>> the raw workflow, which hasn't been turned on, the ProRes files are it.
>> Therefore CC should be high-quality unless you are using an
>> offline/online
>> workflow. Even the Nick Shaw FCP LUTs are "disclaimed" as for offline
>> only,
>> since they are 8-bit. Nevertheless, they are probably good enough for
>> many
>> applications.
>>
>> - Oliver
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at:
>> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at:
> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Monday, January 24, 2011
Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Alexa
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment