Not to shoot you, and not that I expect you to know the answers, but
if the codec still has all the same compression as the SR 440 signal
that you record to tape then why would I spend the money on this? Why
not just record to tape? They need an SSD that does uncompressed.
From the sounds of it I would be better off with a Codex or S.Two.
Jay
On Dec 17, 2010, at 1:28 AM, Tom McDonnell wrote:
> Note: Please don't shoot the messenger.
>
> I saw the Sony prototype Solid State SR recorder today. 1TB card
> Raid5 gives
> 4 hours of 440 Mbps. It can do 880Mbps for 3D albeit at half the
> record
> time. Presently you can only archive to a SRW 5800 at 3X real-time.
> They are
> working on a download station using a SAS interface for speeding up
> off
> loading. Estimated price around 20K for the recorder and 2 512 Gig
> cards.
> According to Sony rep next update of Avid MC 5.5 will read the MXF
> wrapper
> natively. The Sony rep had a MC workstation playing back the SRW
> recorded
> data from the 1Tb card. No you cannot use the XDCAM viewer software
> to see
> it so you will need SRW updated viewer software.
>
> Just thought my post friends would find this interesting.
>
> Tom McDonnell
> Cinematographer
> Los Angeles, CA
> New Orleans, LA
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment