Marcus, you're probably right that Adobe Audition and Adobe Media Encoder used the same core code/engine to convert sample rates. But Audition includes a quality slider that preserves more high frequency info (at the cost of longer render times) and does a good job minimizing aliasing noise. I haven't done direct comparisons between Audition and AME on this stuff, though.
The Google points me to:
On the free side of things, you could probably write a chain/macro to do the conversion in Audacity. Not-fancy interface, good quality conversions. I haven't tried to do that, though.
I bet the standard version of iZotope RX would do a great job. I own and like RX a lot, though I haven't tried pure/isolated sample-rate conversion in it. Straight-ahead batch processing features.
But I'd be tempted to try a few tests with 3 to 4 promising tools, processing my most complex sfx and listening to how they sound after processing.
jim feeley
pov media
word image sound
On May 22, 2016, at 6:00 AM, Marcus gen@rail-net.co.uk [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:On 22/05/2016 04:07, 'Steve Garman' Steve@Garman.com [Avid-L2] wrote:
>
>
> Audition has a batch mode that can do what you need. Runs on Mac or
> Windows. Does an excellent job very quickly.
If it runs in audition it *probably* use the same conversion engine as
media encoder, so it would be probably the same result one would get
from doing it in AME.
Cheers,
Marcus
__._,_.___
Posted by: Jim Feeley <jfeeley@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (8) |
Upgrade your account with the latest Yahoo Mail app
Get organized with the fast and easy-to-use Yahoo Mail app. Upgrade today!
this is the Avid-L2
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment