That's a great link. It raises all kinds of questions as to what would best resemble the performance of the Arri LogC to Rec 709 I'm use to applying in Resolve. I use the 3D LUT in Resolve and it gives me a nice starting point when baking out Avid DNX.
As I google around there are suggestions that 1D LUTs are better if not changing color space. I had always used the 3D LUT because I thought it was more accurate but honestly I'm not aware of all the subtle differences. I had never thought about what color space the Arri was shooting but I assumed LogC was a different color space than Rec 709 but now I'm wondering. I just want to undo the LogC back to Rec 709 so is that better with a 1D or a 3D LUT.
Either I am making this more difficult than it is or it is more complicated than meets the eye. I just want to un LogC the footage like I do in Resolve when I use Resolve's Arri LogC to Rec 709 Output LUT. That isn't hard in Resolve but I have never had to start making tweaks for it to have satisfactory results.
---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <bogdan_grigorescu@...> wrote :
From: "John Moore bigfish@... [Avid-L2]" <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
To: yahoogroups <avid-l2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 7:25 PM
Subject: [Avid-L2] 3D Hard LUT vs. Soft LUT What The LUT?
Posted by: bigfish@pacbell.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (3) |
No comments:
Post a Comment