I worked on a show that took 16mm negative and telecined to HD and it was a joy to work with. This was footage from '63. I'm not speaking to detail but the ability to dig things out of the shadows etc... 4K probably won't do much for the dynamic range but I wouldn't think it would hurt.
---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <davidadodson@...> wrote :
On May 8, 2015, at 9:43 AM, 'Dom Q. Silverio' domqsilverio@... [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:The slower the stock generally the finer the grain size. I agree that generally 2K/1080 is more than sufficient for 16mm.Even some modern 35mm films went through a 2K DI process.Dom Q. SilverioOn Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:39 PM, 'Edit B' bouke@... [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:The 16 mm movies i've restored in the past showed huge amount of grain in the SD telecine.Granted, those were dated between 1911 and app. 1970, and mostly shot on cheap / available stock.Bouke----- Original Message -----From: tcurren@... [Avid-L2]Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 5:17 PMSubject: [Avid-L2] Re: Up-Rez HD to 4KMost 16MM would be showing the grain even at 2K.
---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <pat@...> wrote :I'd agree. Generally 16mm is good to 2K and HD isn't much under that. But a good Telecine to 4K will eak out more for sure.
If you want to get the most then recan the 16mm direct to 4K
Pat Horridge
Technical Director, Trainer, Avid Certified Instructor
VET
Production Editing Digital Media Design DVD
T +44 (0)20 7505 4701 | F +44 (0)20 7505 4800 | E pat@... |
www.vet.co.uk | Lux Building 2-4 Hoxton Square London N1 6US
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Posted by: bigfish@pacbell.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (20) |
No comments:
Post a Comment