It's right there, second from the top.
On 11 sep. 2014, at 20:41, John Beck jb30343@windstream.net [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> But why is there no 3840 x 2160?
__._,_.___
Posted by: "Job ter Burg (L2B)" <Job_L2@terburg.com>
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (47) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment