You're asking a lot and that custom QT exporter from MC is one of the worst things. You've already heard my rants about it I'm sure.
First question is - why do you want to make a 29.97 H.264 from a 23.98 master? This is not gonna look good. H.264 isn't great at preserving interlacing, and you generally don't want it, so the pulldown is going to be bad. I'd opt for staying native 23.98 for your H.264.On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:08 AM, John Moore bigfish@pacbell.net [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Exporting a 23.976 timeline DNX 175X SNDX 5.5.4 OS 10.6.8. I set the export to limit bandwidth to 800Kb/sec. size is 960x540 and I set the frames per second to 29.97 so as to convert the 23.976 frame timeline to a 29.97 fps QT. At first Avid estimated 36 hours. Then I did a video mixdown and it was saying 16 hours. I've resorted to exporting a QT Ref and having QT Pro convert the ref .mov to a 29.97 H.264. This seems to be moving faster judging by the progress bar. The progress bar is an eighth of the way along after 10 minutes or so. Of course I don't know if that's accurate. It does seem like doing the export from Avid with the frame rate conversion is ridiculously long. Am I missing something or some Avid trick to speed up it's H264 export. I rarely use avid to do anything but a QT ref export so I'm a bit surprised.
__._,_.___
Posted by: Mark Spano <cutandcover@gmail.com>
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (2) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment