I can vouch for the don't want to wear glasses part. I don't wear glasses in regular life, so putting them on for 3D is a huge distraction and uncomfortable. I even thought for a second about getting those James Cameron style 3D contact lenses, but it's too expensive and at this point, not worth it. The current incarnation of 3D still isn't enough of a wow for me to care that much. I saw 52 movies in the theater in 2013, and elected for no 3D screenings where applicable, and had a blast.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Mikeparsons.tv <mikeparsons.tv@gmail.com> wrote:
It's ok 3d will be back in 7 years just like every other time it's 'over'.People actually want 3d, they just don't want to wear glasses to see it.I'm the 4k supporter on the list so I may seem biased but I've actually seen quite a lot of Uhd up close and personal and if any of us are honest it looks great. All the nonsense of you can't see any difference unless you have bionic eyes is clearly nonsense when you sit in front of one of the new Sony tvs and switch input resolutions. The up scaling is pretty damn good too - echoes of Farouda labs...But seriously, my advice is if you're going to buy into new tech buy early then you get to enjoy it longer before it's superseded. After all 8k is just around the corner...Mike
Not a big surprise, and of course, 100% predictable:
http://www.avclub.com/article/3d-tvs-arent-really-a-thing-anymore-106743
But now we have to deal with 4K and UHD, and that whole silliness (Not for features, just for TV deliverables. I actually think 4K for cinema makes a version of sense in some situations.)
DD
David Dodson
davidadodson@sbcglobal.net
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (3) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment