Re: [Avid-L2] transcode of dnxhd quicktime seems faster than import

 

thanks job!!

Owen's iphone

On Nov 14, 2013, at 4:53 PM, "Job ter Burg (L2B)" <Job_L2@terburg.com> wrote:

 

Also, if you AMA, then TRANSCODE from DNxHD175 to DNxHD175 you are losing a generation. If you AMA, then CONSOLIDATE the DNxHD175 source, it stays in the same generation.

If you Fast Import, you also stay in the same generation. Fast Import should be just as fast as a consolidate, AFAIK.

On 14 nov. 2013, at 21:04, Mark Spano <cutandcover@gmail.com> wrote:

Link AMA and transcode always burns importing. Importing is slow and old.

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:44 PM, owen <owen@thenowcorporation.com> wrote:

 

Hi,
I tested importing a dnxhd 175x yc 709 quicktime mov to dnxhd same colorspace vs
transcode of a dnxhd 175x 709 quicktime mov to 175x same colorspace as mov and the transcode seems faster.
What is your experience with this?
thanks,
owen

__._,_.___

Reply via web post

Reply to sender

Reply to group

Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (10)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send us Feedback

.

__,_._,___