Thursday, October 17, 2013

RE: Re: [Avid-L2] RE: File Base Deliveries

 

 And you have to QC the entire file again as it is a new output as opposed to just QCing the insert on tape.



---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <avid-l2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

My biggest issue with tapeless delivery is you cannot "insert edit" fixes. Say you misspelled  someone's lower third, or you spot a glitch. You can't simply insert a fix, cut to cut. You have to re-output the entire file again.

Barring that, I love it. Cheaper by far (no $300-$400 tapes and you needing to deliver 4-6 tapes...and then the deck ownership, or even rental)...simply deliver your files on a $100 USB drive.



On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:53 AM, "jeffsengpiehl@..." <jeffsengpiehl@...> wrote:
 
 But also to people who've no clue on how to get a file to pass network QC.   A broader market is possible,  a stupider one however won't make the grade.    You always get what you pay for.


---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <wilsonchao@...> wrote:

HD tape I/O required a $25,000 deck connected to a $5,000 Mac running a free/pirated application.  By eliminating that expensive gear, the market for HD post was opened to a wider market.
On Oct 16, 2013 9:06 AM, "Tony Quinsee-Jover" <tony@...> wrote:
 
On 16/10/2013 05:57, tcurren@... wrote:
> And tape output is bad because....?

... because it was easy and reliable, silly.

Outputting now is so much more... adventuresome.

T.


__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (18)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment