Re: [Avid-L2] Re: "What are you grading this week 2013?", survey results.

OK - well, I'm not in that part of the business, so it's not something I
see. I deliver tons of ProRes to BATON facilities and no one ever complains
about it to me. And it's a breeze on my end, to be able to judge the
quality of a file I'm delivering if it's ProRes or DNxHD.

I definitely appreciate whatever headaches someone else has to take on in
order for this stuff to be easy for me.


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Rupert Watson <rupert@root6.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Mark
>
> In my book the issue with ProRes is the closed nature of the way Apple
> have let it out into the world. Take Baton for example. You can do a
> file based QC of ProRes but they have to treat it as a 'black box'. The
> developers can't crack it open and analyse it and - like Vidchecker -
> and repair it if needed. Other file formats allow that and are therefore
> more useful in a file based workflow.
>
> I was at a conference a while back and a very highly placed exec was
> fulminating against Apple and ProRes for lots of reasons. Even the
> diehard fans are starting to see the light.
>
> Rupert Watson
> +44 7787 554 801
> www.root6.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Mark Spano
> Sent: 24 July 2013 07:33
> To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: "What are you grading this week 2013?",
> survey results.
>
> Why is this insane? ProRes is perfectly fine to deliver for broadcast.
> Are you really getting "abysmal" gamma shifts when creating a ProRes
> file for delivery? I'm not.
>
> I cringe when I don't see it in a deliverable sheet because it means
> "they don't really know" and I need to have a back and forth with
> someone about why it's not great to take broadcast delivery as H.264 or
> worse.
>
> DNxHD and ProRes are both great for broadcast. Neither one is insane.
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Job ter Burg (L2B)
> <Job_L2@terburg.com>wrote:
>
> > **
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Which is PRECISELY what I am calling insane, Oliver. We should all be
> > ashamed to have let that happen. Even if DNx is or was not the answer.
> >
> > On 23 jul. 2013, at 21:28, "oliverpetersvidy" <
> > oliverpeters@oliverpeters.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Nevertheless, ProRes, closely followed by H264 are the two most
> > > common
> > deliverables I run into FOR BROADCAST.
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
> www.root6.com/blog
> Our resource for the latest news, support tips and articles
>
> root6 ltd
> www.root6.com Registered in the UK at: 4 Wardour Mews, London W1F 8AJ
> Tel: +44(0)207437 6052
> Company No. 03433253
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/