When I watched the demo at NAB this year, it actually felt the 3D effect was less pronounced at 48fps. Maybe because of motion fluidity, who knows...
cheers,
BG
www.finale.tv
--- On Mon, 12/17/12, Terence Curren <tcurren@aol.com> wrote:
From: Terence Curren <tcurren@aol.com>
Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: 48fps
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, December 17, 2012, 4:48 PM
Jackson said he wanted the 48 because 3D worked better at higher frame rates. So the 48 was really just for the 3D.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Job ter Burg (L2B)" <Job_L2@...> wrote:
<<48fps did seem to make the whole 3D experience more balanced and less distracting. Wondering if that's the reason that they don't show a 2D HFR version >>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (3) |
No comments:
Post a Comment