I haven't used Film Stocks, but when testing Looks on I found the stability
a little variable (sometimes it would be quite crashy, other times it was
fine). But that was previous versions of Symphony and Looks, so that may be
better now.
I found Looks to be quite a lot of fun to use, and surprisingly powerful
once you got used to the interface.
Dylan Reeve
http://dylanreeve.com/
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Benjamin Hershleder <Ben@contactben.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> Thanks Oliver. I appreciate you taking the time to offer that info.
> I see that I have some experimenting/evaluating ahead of me!
> Cheers,
>
> B
>
>
> Benjamin Hershleder
> http://ContactBen.com
> http://Hershleder.com
>
> Wear It In Post!
> Fun T-shirts, mousepads, mugs & more
> for Post Production Professionals
> http://www.WearItInPost.com
>
> On Apr 10, 2012, at 6:24 AM, oliverpetersvidy wrote:
>
> > Both are good. Film Stocks is centered around film stock emulations, as
> well as various other film-oriented processes. MB Looks has a cross section
> of various different tools, including lens effects, filtering, color
> correction and skim smoothing. Film Stocks also exposes more controls in
> the effects control pane without having to go into the custom UI. MB Looks
> gives you masking in the effects control pane. Film Stocks is the BEST film
> "looks" package on the market. MB Looks is a more general "looks" creation
> tool. Neither is better or worse than the other. Just subjective
> preferences. If you care about FCP X, only MB Looks works in X at this
> time. Both work in current versions of MC/Sym/NC.
> >
> > - Oliver
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment