Thanks Bart, that makes sense. Yes, FCP has always been better with third party graphics than MC.
Best,
Shirley
-----Original Message-----
From: Bart van den Broek <bart@filmdoc.nl>
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Jun 26, 2011 2:28 am
Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Why fcpx is bad for avid
I'm sorry for using the term 'finishing'.
Must be the language barrier. We don't do any grading in fcp we send our avid
projects to baselight etc. But when it gets back as uncompressed qt the easiest
way to get some graphics, titles and other stuff in is fcp before putting it on
tape or export it. I understand there are beautiful systems that can do that
even faster (at another pricepoint) but doing it in mc will really slow things
down. Time consuming import or not reliable ama mounting, bad graphical
workflow, quality problems etc.
You would need a lot of third party tools to get it right. So im not saying fcp
is the perfect tool for this but much more flexible than mc.
Bart van den Broek
<Mobiel verstuurd dus kort&bondig>
FILMDOC B.V.
Oostenburgervoorstraat 152
1018 MR Amsterdam
020-4200420
06-24206619
------------------------------------
Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell
phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next
cell bill.Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment