Seriously? It's a piece written ENTIRELY by Apple.
There's a new disclaimer on the article even. (I just posted a response about what a crappy article it is.)
Pogue can't possibly understand what he's writing about here. He doesn't understand the pros or the cons. He's just a mouthpiece.
The article is basically him realizing that he's in WAY over his head, understood NOTHING in his previous article and a TON of people basically told him so on a public forum, which was probably humiliating to him, so he penned a response, informed COMPLETELY by Apple product managers.
Crap, next time I need to dump some one-sided PR on an unsuspecting world, I guess I'll call the Times.
Steve Hullfish
contributor: www.provideocoalition.com
author: "The Art and Technique of Digital Color Correction"
On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Jonathan Donley wrote:
> Here is a link to the nyt article. I found it to be very even handed
> regarding pro's and cons of fcpx
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/23/technology/personaltech/23pogue.html?emc=eta1
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment