Didn't Avid buy and repackage DS as their HD solution? I thought that's when the initial EOL of Symphony talk started. That was a big thing. If you wanted HD you had to learn DS or go to another product.
KEN
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "oliverpetersvidy" <oliverpeters@...> wrote:
>
> > chris magid wrote:
> > of our OS X Smoke.
>
> I'm curious. With all of your thoughts about Symphony, what do you think an Avid "finishing" editor should look like? In some ways, this is what Avid tried to do with DS and the MC-centric user base slapped them down for it. "MC-izing" the interface simply didn't make either DS nor MC editors happy.
>
> How does Smoke-OSX stack up in this scenario? Why not just dump your Symphonies in favor of an all-Smoke environment?
>
> Is there really a market for an enhanced Symphony outside of long-form conforming? I mean, speaking strictly from my Florida-based point-of-view, I see no market at all for this type of product in my neck of the woods. There is certainly a need, but no one controlling the purse strings willing to spend more than they currently do for FCP/MC Soft/CS.
>
> - Oliver
>
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment