This may seem obvious but does the Ki Pro do these conversion in an e to e or pass through state or does it have to be recording the signal at the same time?
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Wilson Chao <wilsonchao@...> wrote:
>
> I've only used the Teranex mini and the Ki Pro for "easy" conversions
> like upconverteing NTSC to 1080i, downconverting 1080i to NTSC, and
> crossconverting 720p to 1080i. Since these require neither frame rate
> changes nor de-interlacing, both boxes look fine.
>
> I have a friend who does multicamera flypack "Image Magnification"
> shoots for live stage shows. He has a bunch of widescreen NTSC
> cameras pushing out component analog video. He converts to SD-SDI,
> switches in a little Panasonic switcher, then feeds a Ki Pro which
> bumps it to 1080i for the big projectors on stage. Just about
> everybody *thinks* he's shooting HD. (The switcher has a Multiviewer
> display on a plasma screen so the director can't see any native HD
> anyway.) And the only recordings of the show come off the Ki Pro in
> 1080i too, so nobody's the wiser.
>
> But sure, if I needed to do difficult conversions, I'd use a big Teranex.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:50 PM, ksirul <kenavid2@...> wrote:
> > Does it take drink orders too? Seriously though, how is the up/down/crossconversion quality compared to the Teranex Mini?
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Wilson Chao <wilsonchao@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The Teranex mini is a good buy for under $3K. But $4K gets you an AJA
> > > Ki Pro, which kicks butt and takes names.
>
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment